The earliest schools of Sanskritists in Europe
entered into the study of Sanskrit with more imagination than critical ability.
They knew a little, expected much from that little, and often tried to make too
much of what little they knew.
Then, in those days even, such vagaries as the
estimation of Shakuntala as forming the
high watermark of Indian philosophy were not altogether unknown!
These were
naturally followed by a reactionary band of superficial critics, more than real
scholars of any kind, who knew little or nothing of Sanskrit, expected nothing
from Sanskrit studies, and ridiculed everything from the East.
While
criticising the unsound imaginativeness of the early school to whom everything
in Indian literature was rose and musk, these, in their turn, went into
speculations which, to say the least, were equally highly unsound and indeed
very venturesome. And their boldness was very naturally helped by the fact that
these over-hasty and unsympathetic scholars and critics were addressing an
audience whose entire qualification for pronouncing any judgment in the matter
was their absolute ignorance of Sanskrit.
What a medley of results from such
critical scholarship!
- Swami Vivekananda,
‘On Dr
Paul Deussen’ - Article in
Brahmavadin, 1896
No comments:
Post a Comment